STATEOBLIGATIONS. 1. In consideration for the services performed under this Agreement, State shall reimburse Agency 92.22 percent of eligible costs incurred in carrying out the Project up to the maxi
AbstractUnder international human rights law, the breach of human rights and its consequences lie with a contracting state rather than the perpetrator, because only states have the power and the duty to establish the laws and maintain institutions that ensure the respect and protection of such rights. An important question that will be discussed in this section is what exactly is a human rights violation? Put into perspective, why does torture or trafficking committed by the state, or a failure to take appropriate measures to proscribe it, constitute a violation of human rights whereas the same conduct perpetrated by a private individual is considered a crime. Article 2 of the Draft Articles specifies the conditions required to establish the breach of an international obligation. First, there must be conduct involving some action or omission that is attributable to the state under international law. Second, the conduct must constitute a breach of an international obligation in force in that state. This section discusses the nature and scope of Statesâ Obligations under international human rights law. Additionally, insight is provided into how the Palermo Protocol operates interdependently with International Human Rights Law to balance the shared goals of preventing the crime, protecting victims, and prosecuting traffickers. 2009, pp. 175, Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, as contained in Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 53rd Session, UN Doc A/55/10 2000 Art. Szablewska 2007, p. Article 21. 1993, pp. 297â318; Schabas 2003, pp. 908â Nations General Assembly 1966, p. Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 31 The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant ¶ 8, Doc. CCPR/C/21/ May 24, 2006. 2009, pp. 437, 2006, pp. 379, Protocol, Article 51; ICCPR, Article 22; United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Trafficking, E/2002/68/ 2002, principle 2004. 2014. 2012, pp. 29â of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, Article 15, United Nations 2005; Cf. OHCHR 2014; State Responsibility, A/ and Add. 1â7, 271998 James Crawford, First report on State responsibility on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Eleventh Session, General Recommendation No. 19 Violence Against Women, art. 9 1989. 2014. Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment, Rep. No. 4 Ser. C ¶ 172 29 July 1988; see also the development of the concept of due diligence in Jessica Lenahan v. United States Inter-American Commission 2011. For example, âdue diligenceâ is implicitly enshrined in Article 2 1 2014. 2017, p. at v. Greece, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 71545/12, Judgment, ¶¶ 70â72 21 January 2011; Siliadin v. France, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 73316/01, Judgment 2005, ¶¶ 70â72; Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, Application , ¶ 285, 7 January 2010. at ¶ 2017, p. For an example of circumstances where the state was not found in violation of its positive obligation because the harm was not foreseeable, see Rantsev, supra note 26, at ¶ 222; and Mastromatteov v. Italy, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, App. No. 37703/97, ¶¶ 178â 2017, pp. 327â at 328; See E. and Others v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, App. No. 33218/96, Judgment, ¶ 99 26 November 2002. v. Ireland, [GC] App. No. 35810/09, 28 January 2014, para. 149; see also Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, App. 28005/08, 14 March 2013, para. 2017, p. Chowdury and Others v. Greece, supra note 15 at ¶¶110â Nestorova, Executive Secretary, Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA and Committee of the Parties, CoE, Understanding human trafficking in the private economy-forms, industries and sectors involved, latest trends and responsibility of the private sector Conference âThe Public-Private Partnership in the Fight against Human Traffickingâ Moscow, July 20â21, 2017. v. Ireland [GC] App no. 35819/09 ECtHR, January 28, 2014 ¶ Opuz v Turkey App no 33401/02 ECHR 9 June 2009. The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence 2011, article 5, has also adopted a due diligence standard in the protection of human rights Parties shall take the necessary legislative and other measures to exercise due diligence to prevent, investigate, punish, and provide reparation for acts of violence covered by the scope of this Convention that are perpetrated by non-state Ivette Gonzales and Others v Mexico, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Series C No 205, Judgment, ¶ 284 15 November 2009. Res 48/104, UN GAOR, 48th sess, 85th plen mtg, UN Doc A/48/49 December 20, 1993. GAOR 1995. at Maastricht, 22â26 January 1997, [18] Maastricht Guidelinesâ. Although not legally binding, the Maastricht Guidelines have served as persuasive aids in the interpretation of economic, social, and cultural Talmon 2019, p. 2009, p. 2004, pp. 17â 2017, pp. 325â 2001. Alliance Against Traffic in Women GAATW 2017, p. Alliance Against Traffic in Women GAATW 2017, p. of Regional and Sub-Regional Structures, supra note 53, at 4â 2006. of Regional and Sub-Regional Structures, supra note 53, at 4â the APDF & IHRDA v. Republic of Mali case, for example, an NGO filed a complaint to the African Court alleging that certain provisions of the Malian Persons and Family Code were not in compliance with the Protocol to African Charter on Human and Peoplesâ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa the Maputo Protocol. Xavier Damiba and Laurent Nare, Proverbes Mossi Abidjan, 1999 proverb no. 785. 2005, pp. 145, 170; see also OHCHR, Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Trafficking, Recommended Principles on Human Rights and Human Trafficking, principle 2010, p. 2003, p. 2008a, pp. 171â Crime Convention, Article 16. Legislative Guide to the Organized Crime Convention and its Protocols, Part I, ¶¶403, 414â supra note 69; United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, Res. 55/25, Doc. A/45/49 Vol. I 2001 art. 16 10; Id. at 193â241; UNODC Toolkit, supra note 73, at 119â172; Commentary on the Recommended Principles and Guidelines, supra note 68, at 203â Convention on Extradition 1994. 2010, p. Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, Articles 18â19; see also UNODC 2008b. 2010, pp. 1, Depât of State, supra note supra note 81, at Baseline Assessment, supra note 55, at 20â and Kigbu 2015, p. Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2010 Nigeria Jun. 2010. Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2014 Nigeria Jun. 2014. 2001. 2006, pp. 377, 399â400. ReferencesChirwa DM 2004 The doctrine of state responsibility as a potential means of holding private actors accountable for human rights. Melbourne J Int Law 517â18. SO 2013 The human being as a commodity responding to the trafficking and trading of persons in West Africa, Kofi Annan Peacekeeping Training Centre, September 2013. 2001 Declaration on the fight against trafficking in persons. Convention on Extradition 1994 Article 2. The Protocol of 2005 provided for the establishment of a regional Criminal Intelligence and Investigation Bureau CIIB for the West African region Google Scholar Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women GAATW 2017 Facilitating migration and fulfilling rights â to reduce smuggling of migrants and prevent trafficking in persons, 5. JO 1992 International extradition issues arising under the dual criminality requirement. BYU Law Rev 1191 Google Scholar Hassan YB, Kigbu SK 2015 An assessment of the institutional framework for combating human trafficking in Nigeria. J Law Policy Glob 39249. MN 2010 Interstate cooperation and anti-trafficking assessing existing approaches between Nigeria and the United Kingdom 107. J 2003 Borderline slaveryâchild trafficking in Togo. Hum Rts Watch 15819. B 2010 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters based on the ECCAS, COMESA and SADC Treaties. Afr Law Stud Libr 51, 2. A 2012 The extend of state obligations in preventing and combating trafficking in human beings challenges and perspectives for a European human rights-based approach, pp 29â33 unpublished Central European University on file in Central European University at MY 2005 State responsibilities in combating trafficking in persons in Central Asia. Loy L A Int Comp Law Rev 27145, 170 Google Scholar Obokata T 2006 A human rights framework to address trafficking of human beings. Neth Q Hum Rights 243 Google Scholar OHCHR 2010 Commentary on the recommended principles and guidelines, 203 Google Scholar OHCHR 2014 Human rights and human trafficking, Fact Sheet No. 36, 11. LM 2009 Practical challenges of implementing the complementarity between international humanitarian and human rights law â demonstrated by the procedural regulation of internment in non-international armed conflict. Case West Res J Int Law 40437, 450. R 2009 The legal nature of trafficking in human beings. Intercult Hum Rights Law 4175, 193 Google Scholar Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, Application No. 25965/04 7 January 2010 available at Google Scholar Rodley N 1993 Can armed opposition groups violate human rights? In Mahoney KE, Mahoney P eds Human rights in the twenty-first century a global challenge. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 297â318 Google Scholar Salah R 2001 Child trafficking in West and Central Africa an overview. UNICEF 6-7, 19 February 2001. W 2003 Punishment of non-state actors in non-international armed conflict. Fordham Int Law J 26908â909 Google Scholar Siliadin v. France, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 73316/01, Judgment 2005 Google Scholar Stoyanova V 2017 Human trafficking and slavery reconsidered conceptual limits and stateâs positive obligations in European law. CUP Google Scholar Szablewska N 2007 Non-state actors and human rights in non-international armed conflicts. S Afr Yearb Int Law 32346 Google Scholar Talmon S 2019 The procedural obligation under Article 2 ECHR to investigate and cooperate with investigations of unlawful killings in a cross-border context. Hum Rights Int Law 1399 Google Scholar UN GAOR 1995 The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted by the Beijing Fourth World Conference on Women reaffirmed this principle Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, Annex I, UN Doc. A/ Google Scholar United Nations General Assembly 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Treaty Series 999 December 1966, p 171 Google Scholar UNODC 2006 Training manual assistance for the implementation of the ECOWAS plan of action against trafficking in persons, at V. 2008a Toolkit to combat trafficking in persons, Sales No. 171â173. 2008b Toolkit to combat trafficking in persons, Sales No. references Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsSaint Thomas University, Miami Gardens, FL, USAPaul V. I. Sidlawinde KarengaAuthorsPaul V. I. Sidlawinde KarengaYou can also search for this author in PubMed Google ScholarList of Cases/DocumentsList of Cases/Documents Trafficking in persons Enhancing Criminal Investigation, Prosecution and Victim/witness Protection in African and European Countries, Africa-EU Partnership Working Group Dec. 1, 2011, United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, Res. 55/25, Doc. A/45/49 Vol. I 2001 art. 16 10.; Id. at 193â241; UNODC Toolkit, supra note 73, at 119â172; OHCHR, Commentary on the Recommended Principles and Guidelines, 2010 supra note 68, at 203â212. APDF & IHRDA v. Republic of Mali, AfCHPR 15, No. 046/2016 20180. Chowdury and Others v. Greece, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 21884/15, Judgment ¶ 124 ¶ 73 30 Mar. 2017, Chowdury and Others v. Greece, note 15 at ¶¶110â115 Claudia Ivette Gonzales and Others v Mexico, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Series C No 205, Judgment, ¶ 284 15 November 2009. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Eleventh Session, General Recommendation No. 19 Violence Against Women, art. 9 1989. Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, as contained in Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 53rd Session, UN Doc A/55/10 2000 E. and Others v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, App. No. 33218/96, Judgment, ¶ 99 26 November 2002. ECOWAS Common Approach on Migration, ECOWAS Comm. Jan. 18, 2008, ECOWAS Convention on Extradition A/P1/8/94, adopted on 6 August 1994, entered into force December 8, 2005 ECOWAS Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters A/P1/7/92, adopted on 29 July 1992, entered into force on 28 October 1998, 2329 UNTS 301 ECOWAS Convention. ECOWAS Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, Articles 18â19. Fact Sheet on the Extradition Treaty, Embassies and Consulates in the Nov. 16 2011, Francois Xavier Damiba and Laurent Nare, Proverbes Mossi Abidjan, 1999 proverb no. 785. GA Res 48/104, UN GAOR, 48th sess, 85th plen mtg, UN Doc A/48/49 December 20, 1993. ICCPR Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 31 The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant ¶ 8, Doc. CCPR/C/21/ May 24, 2006. Id.; FMM West Africa, Counter-Trafficking Baseline Assessment 19â21 2017, Investigation and Monitoring, Natâl. Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons, Jessica Lenahan v. United States Inter-American Commission 2011. Koraou v. Niger, ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, Judgment, No. ECW/CCJ/APP/0808, ¶¶ 82â85 Oct. 27, 2008 available at v. Greece, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 71545/12, Judgment, ¶¶ 70â72 21 January 2011. Legislative Guides for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocol Thereto, UNODC 2, at XVI 2004, Legislative Guides for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocol Thereto, UNODC 2, ¶ 217 2004, Mastromatteov v. Italy, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment, App. No. 37703/97, ¶¶ 178â179. NAPTIP Rescues 12,000, Rehabilitates 6,000, Secures 325 Convictions, Vanguard Nigeria Sep. 13, 2017, OâKeefee v. Ireland [GC] App no. 35819/09 ECtHR, January 28, 2014 ¶144 OâKeefee v. Ireland, [GC] App. No. 35810/09, 28 January 2014, para. 149; see also Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, App. 28005/08, 14 March 2013, ¶181. OHCHR, Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Trafficking, Recommended Principles on Human Rights and Human Trafficking, principle 14 Opuz v Turkey App no 33401/02 ECHR 9 June 2009. Organized Crime Convention, Article 16. Legislative Guide to the Organized Crime Convention and its Protocols, Part I, ¶¶403, 414â417. Petya Nestorova, Executive Secretary, Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA and Committee of the Parties, CoE, Understanding human trafficking in the private economy-forms, industries and sectors involved, latest trends and responsibility of the private sector Conference âThe Public-Private Partnership in the Fight against Human Traffickingâ Moscow, July 20â21, 2017. Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, No. 25965/04, ECtHR, ¶204 January 7, 2010 Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, No. 25965/04, ECtHR, ¶203 January 7, 2010 Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, Article 15, United Nations 2005. State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities Corporate Activities under the United Nationsâ core Human Rights Treaties, OHCR, 3 June 2007 State Responsibility, A/ and Add. 1â7, 271998 James Crawford, First report on State responsibility The Cost of Coercion Global Report on the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, ILO 42â43 May 12, 2009, The Impact of Free Movement and the Challenges of Migration, Migr. Dialogue for W. Afr. MIDWA Aug. 23, 2016, The Role of Naptip in the Control of Human Trafficking in Nigeria 2004â2009, Kubanni 103, Thematic Meeting on Trafficking in Human Beings and the Smuggling of Migrants, Intâl Ctr. Migr. 10 Dec. 3, 2015, Trafficking in persons Enhancing Criminal Investigation, Prosecution and Victim/witness Protection in African and European Countries, Africa-EU Partnership Working Group Dec. 1, 2011, Training for TIP Natâl Focal Points, Intâl Training Ctr. of the Intâl Lab. Org., Action for Cooperation Against Trafficking in Persons, Summary of Regional and Sub-Regional Structures and Initiatives to Counter Trafficking in Persons 4â5 Dec. 2010, [hereinafter Summary of Regional and Sub-Regional Structures]. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Draft Compendium of Trafficking-Related Tools Developed at the Regional Level, at 39, Ofc. on Drugs and Crime âUNODCâ, Regional Strategy for Combating Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of Migrants 2015â2020, Depât of Just., Attorneysâ Manual § 9â Apr. 2018, Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2008 Nigeria Jun. 2008 Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2008 Nigeria Jun. 2008, Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2010 Ghana Jun. 2010, Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2010 Nigeria Jun. 2010. Depât of State, Trafficking in Persons Report 2014 Nigeria Jun. 2014. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Trafficking, E/2002/68/ 2002, Velasquez Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment, Rep. No. 4 Ser. C ¶ 172 29 July 1988. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, ¶ 66 c, Doc. A/8010/ 1970 accessed from Rights and permissions Copyright information© 2022 The Authors, under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapterCite this chapterKarenga, 2022. Statesâ Obligations Under International Human Rights Law. In A West African Model to Address Human Trafficking. Springer, Cham. 02 February 2022 Publisher Name Springer, Cham Print ISBN 978-3-030-88119-1 Online ISBN 978-3-030-88120-7eBook Packages Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology R0
TOSTATE RULES AND OBLIGATIONS Diposting oleh Kun Handayani di 05.29. Kirimkan Ini lewat Email BlogThis! Berbagi ke Twitter Berbagi ke Facebook Bagikan ke Pinterest. Tidak ada komentar: Posting Komentar. Posting Lebih Baru Posting Lama Beranda. Langganan: Posting Komentar (Atom) Mengenai Saya. Kun Handayani
May 20231. Governing TextsPrivacy law in the Province of Quebec is comprised of various federal and provincial statutes. These laws include privacy laws of general application for both private and public organisations, as well as sector-specific statutes and related laws, such as anti-spam note that on 21 September 2021, the National Assembly passed an Act to modernise legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information 'Act 25' formerly known as 'Bill 64'. Act 25 provides for an entry into force date of over three years, but most of the provisions will enter into force in September 2023. Act 25 has resulted in significant amendments to various laws in order to modernise the regulatory framework for the protection of personal data in Guidance Note has been prepared to take into consideration the significant changes introduced by Act Key acts, regulations, directives, billsAt the provincial level, the Act Respecting the Protection of Personal Information in the Private Sector, CQLR 'the Quebec Private Sector Act' regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by private organisations referred to as 'enterprises'. At the federal level, private organisations are regulated by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act 2000 'PIPEDA'.The Act Respecting Access to Documents Held by Public Bodies and the Protection of Personal Information, CQLR c. 'the Quebec Access Act' regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by public bodies and provides individuals with a right of access to their personal Anti-Spam Legislation, SC 2010 c 23 'CASL' also regulates commercial marketing provincial laws include privacy provisions, such as the Act to Establish a Legal Framework for Information Technology, c. 'the Quebec Information Technology Act', which includes specific requirements for the collection, use, and disclosure of biometric focus of this Guidance Note will be on the Quebec Private Sector Act and the Quebec Access Act, with limited information on PIPEDA and the GuidelinesThe Quebec Commission on Access to Information 'CAI' publishes guidance materials on its website to inform both the public and organisations of their rights and obligations under Quebec's privacy laws, including the followingthe Evolving Space â Bill 64 only available in French here; andPrivacy Officer guidance only available in French here.Most of the information is published in French, but some is available in English as illustrated belowBiometrics Principles and Legal Duties of Organizations;Pandemic, privacy and protection of personal information;The lease and protection of personal information Principles and guidelines to observe;Access to information and the confidentiality of personal information on Internet;Guide to the destruction of documents that contain personal information;Management of personal information in universities and cegeps;Loss or theft of personal information How should you react? Checklist for citizens; andRules for use of surveillance cameras with recording in public places by public Quebec regulatory framework is supplemented at the federal level by guidance documents relating to the CASL issued by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada 'OPC' and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission 'CRTC'. Case lawThe following findings and decisions are among the recent and notable findings by the CAI 2014-2022CAI 1016217-S â Investigation into Compagnie Selenis Canada, about the use of a biometric time clock only available in French here;CAI 1005645-S â Investigation into Transplant QuĂ©bec, on certain practices of the organization only available in French hereCAI 1023158-S â Investigation into Clearview AI Inc., on the practices of the organization with respect to the collection and use of images of people from photos posted on the Internet only available in French here;PIPEDA Report of Findings 2021-001 'Report 2021-001' see also CAI 1023158-S only available in French here for an order made following PIPEDA Report 2021-001;CAI 1020846-S â Investigation into FĂ©dĂ©ration des caisses Desjardins du QuĂ©bec only available in French here;CAI 1019951-S â Investigation into IvanhoĂ© Cambridge Inc. and Innovations Galilei 2 only available in French here;CAI 1018507-S â Investigation into Les 3 Pilliers only available in French here;CAI 1005977-S â Investigation into Bell MobilitĂ© only available in French here;CAI 1009621-S and 1009629-S â Investigation into ConfĂ©dĂ©ration des syndicats nationaux, about use and disclosure of personal data published on social networks as part of a union campaign without the consent of the data subject only available in French here;CAI 1007894-S â Investigation into Centre de service partagĂ©s du QuĂ©bec et SecrĂ©tariat du Conseil du TrĂ©sor, about collection of Social Insurance Numbers 'SIN' to submit an online application only available in French here;CAI 1006934-S â Investigation into Thomson Tremblay Inc. only available in French here, about the collection of SIN at the pre-employment stage see also CAI 1005625-S â Investigation into Hunt Personnel about the collection of social security numbers only available in French here;CAI 1011820-S â Investigation into Ville de QuĂ©bec, about the use of drones only available in French here; andCAI 080272 â Investigation into Garderie Coeur d'Enfant Inc., about the use of video surveillance only available in French here.2. Scope of Personal scopeQuebec Private Sector Act The Quebec Private Sector Act applies to the collection, use, or disclosure referred to as 'communication' of personal information within the province by 'any person carrying on an enterprise', whether such information is held by the enterprise itself or by a third-party. Unlike PIPEDA, the Quebec Private Sector Act applies regardless of whether an activity is commercial in the Quebec Private Sector Act applies to such information regardless of its medium and regardless of the form in which it is accessible, whether written, graphic, recorded, filmed, computerised, or applies to the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information by an organisation in the course of its commercial activities, or in respect of personal information about an employee of the organisation or an applicant for employment with the organisation and that the organisation uses or discloses in connection with the operation of a federal work, undertaking, or business such as banks, telecommunications companies, shipping companies, and railways. PIPEDA also applies when the personal information is disclosed across provincial or international often arise as to whether the Quebec Private Sector Act or PIPEDA applies to a particular activity. The answers depend on the circumstances of each Access ActThe Quebec Access Act applies to documents held by a public body in the exercise of its functions and to documents held by a professional order to the extent provided for in the Professional Code. The Quebec Access Act regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by public bodies and professional orders, and provides individuals with a right of access to their personal the Quebec Access Act applies whether the document is recorded in writing or in print, on sound tape or film, in computerised form, or CASL regulates, among other things, the sending of commercial electronic messages such as promotional and marketing messages, to and from Canada. It prohibits the sending of commercial electronic messages unless express or implied consent is obtained, or an exemption applies, and prescribed requirements are Territorial scopeQuebec Private Sector ActThe Quebec Private Sector Act is silent with respect to its extraterritorial application. However, in the joint investigation of Clearview AI under Report 2021-001, the CAI has considered that, even if the system and the enterprise are located outside of Quebec, by offering its services and by collecting and using personal information within the limits of the province, the enterprise operates a business in it is subject to the legislation in force in the jurisdiction in which it operates, the Quebec Private Sector Act see CAI 1023158-S only available in French here.Quebec Access ActThe Quebec Access Act is silent on its territorial Material scopeQuebec Private Sector ActThe Quebec Private Sector Act applies to 'any person carrying on an enterprise', which means an organised economic activity, whether or not it is commercial in nature, consisting of the production, management, or sale of property or the provision of a also applies to personal information held by a professional order to the extent provided for in the Professional Code, and to personal information held by a political party, an independent Member of Parliament, or an independent candidate, to the extent provided for in the Election Quebec Private Sector Act does not apply topersonal information relating to the performance of the individualâs duties within an enterprise by the person concerned, such as the individualâs name, title, and duties, as well as the address, email address, and telephone number of the individualâs place of work;journalistic, historical, or genealogical material collected, held, used, or disclosed for the legitimate information of the public;a public body within the meaning of the Quebec Access Act; andinformation held by a person other than a public body on behalf of a public Access ActThe Quebec Access Act applies to documents held by a public body and to documents held by a professional Quebec Access Act does not apply tothe civil status acts and registers;the registers and other documents kept by registry offices for publication purposes;the register referred to in Chapter II of the Quebec Access Act for the Act Respecting the Legal Publicity of Enterprises, c. archives referred to in Section 27 of the Archives Act, ordocuments contained in a filerelating to the adoption of a person held by a public body; orheld by the Public Curator on a person whom they represent or whose property they manage, except in certain circumstances to allow the CAI to carry out specific Quebec Access Act does not apply to specific requirements for the user's records pursuant to the An Act Respecting Health Services and Social Services Revised Statutes of Quebec chapter or also in certain circumstances set out in specific Data Protection Authority Regulatory Authority Main regulator for data protectionThe CAI is the regulatory authority that oversees the application of the Quebec Private Sector Act and the Quebec Access Act. The CAI sometimes works collaboratively with the OPC and other provincial and territorial privacy commissioners on investigations and policy is administered by the OPC, while the CASL is administered by the CRTC, the Competition Bureau of Canada, and the Main powers, duties and responsibilitiesThe CAI consists of two divisions the Oversight Division and the Adjudication CAI consists of two divisions the Oversight Division and the Adjudication DivisionThe main functions of the CAI's Oversight Division are to monitor the implementation of the Quebec Private Sector Act and the Quebec Access Act, and to ensure that the principles of access to documents and the protection of personal information are respected and this end, the CAI may investigate the application of the Quebec Private Sector Act and the Quebec Access Act and the degree of compliance with these acts. These investigations may be carried out on its own initiative or on the basis of a complaint from any the end of the investigation, and after giving to the enterprise or to the public body an opportunity to submit written observations, the CAI mayUnder the Quebec Private Sector Actrecommend or order the application of such remedial measures as are appropriate to ensure the protection of the personal information. If, within a reasonable time after issuing an order with respect to a person who operates an enterprise, the CAI is of the opinion that appropriate measures have not been taken, it may publish a notice to inform the public thereof. Any person with a direct interest may appeal against an order issued following an the Quebec Access Actrecommend or order the adoption of measures that the CAI considers appropriate. If, within a reasonable time after making a recommendation to a public body or after issuing an order, the CAI considers that appropriate measures have not been taken to implement the recommendation, it may notify the Government of Quebec or, if it deems it appropriate, submit a special report to the National Assembly or set out the situation in its annual report. A person directly interested can appeal the order issued following an investigation to a judge of the Court of CAI may alsoUnder the Quebec Private Sector Actrequire the production of any information or documents Sections and of the Quebec Privacy Act as amended by Act 25;order any person involved in a confidentiality incident to take any action to protect the rights of the individuals involved, including an order that the compromised personal information be returned to the business or be destroyed Section of the Quebec Privacy Act as amended by Act 25; andenter into an undertaking with a business to remedy a breach or mitigate its consequences Section of the Quebec Privacy Act as amended by Act 25; anddevelop guidelines to assist in the administration of the Quebec Private Sector the Quebec Access Actapprove agreements entered into between public bodies;give its opinion on the draft regulations submitted to it under the Quebec Access Act, on draft agreements on the transfer of information and on draft orders authorising the creation of confidential files;ensure that the confidentiality of personal information contained in the files of public bodies relating to the adoption of a person is respected;ensure that the confidentiality of personal information contained in the files of the Public Curator concerning the persons they represent or whose property they manage is respected;approve the governance rules regarding personal information submitted by the personal information manager;require the production of any information or document;order any person involved in a privacy incident to take any action to protect the rights of the individuals involved, including ordering the return or destruction of the compromised personal information;prohibit a person from making an application without the approval of the president and upon such terms and conditions as the president determines; anddevelop guidelines to assist in the administration of the Quebec Access exercising its oversight functions, the CAI may authorise members of its staff or any other persons to act as divisionThe CAI's Adjudication Division hears applications for review made under the Quebec Access Act and applications for review of disputes made under the Quebec Private Sector Act, to the exclusion of any other receipt of an application, the CAI must give the parties an opportunity to present their observations, including through a mediation CAI has all the powers necessary to exercise over its jurisdiction; it may issue any order it deems appropriate to protect the rights of the parties, and may rule on any question of fact or of particular, under the Quebec Private Sector Act, the CAI may order an organisation to disclose or rectify personal information or to refrain from doing so. Furthermore, under the Quebec Access Act, the CAI may order a public body to disclose or refrain from disclosing a document or part of a document, to correct, complete, clarify, update or delete personal information, or to cease the use or disclosure of personal CAI shall make its decision within three months of the date on which the matter was brought before it, unless the Chairperson extends that period for valid decision of the CAI on a question of fact within its jurisdiction is person directly interested may bring an appeal from the final decision of the CAI to a judge of the Court of Quebec on a question of law or jurisdiction, or, with leave of a judge of that court, from an interlocutory decision that will not be remedied by the final Key DefinitionsData controller 'Data controller' is not explicitly defined in the Quebec privacy laws. The entities considered to be in control of, and responsible for complying with the privacy law requirements are referred to as 'persons carrying on an enterprise' pursuant to the Quebec Private Sector Act and 'public bodies' pursuant to the Quebec Access processor 'Data processor' is not defined in the Quebec privacy laws, although they refer to 'mandatary' or 'person performing a contract'.Personal data 'Personal information' is defined as information relating to a natural person and allows that person to be identified, directly or data Personal information is deemed sensitive if, 'due to its nature including medical, biometric, or otherwise intimate information or the context of its use or release, it entails a high level of reasonable expectation of privacy'. Sensitive information requires explicit consent and is subject to a higher level of data 'Health data' is not defined in the Quebec privacy data 'Biometric data' is not defined in the Quebec privacy laws. However, the Quebec Information Technology Act regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of 'biometric characteristics or measurements'.Pseudonymisation 'Pseudonymisation' is not specifically defined in the Quebec privacy laws. However, the Quebec Private Sector Act provides that personal information is 'anonymised' when it can be reasonably expected at any time, under the circumstances, to irreversibly prevent the individual from being directly or indirectly identified. In addition, personal information is 'de-identified' when it no longer allows the individual to be directly subject 'Data subject' is not defined in the Quebec privacy laws, which refer to 'person concerned' Legal ConsentUnder Quebec's privacy laws, unless an exception applies, consent is required. To be valid, consent must be clear, free, and informed, and given for specific purposes. Consent must be requested for each such purpose, in clear and simple language and, if requested in writing, separately from any other information provided to the individual. Consent is valid only for the time necessary to achieve the purposes for which it is sought. It may be withdrawn with respect to the use or disclosure of the information must be expressly given for sensitive personal information. Although not explicitly stated in the Quebec Private Sector Act, it is understood that implied consent is permitted for non-sensitive personal Quebec Information Technology Act also requires explicit consent for biometric obtain valid consent, organisations must be transparent about their practices and must disclose the information required by the law at the time the information is collected and subsequently upon Contract with the data subjectPlease see the section above on consent for express and implied consent. Contracts may contain or incorporate express consent or provide a basis for implied consent, depending on the Legal obligationsQuebec's privacy laws allow organisations to collect, use, and disclose personal information without consent where required by law, for examplewhen the information is required for the purpose of prosecuting of an offence under an act applicable in Quebec; orfor the prevention, detection, or suppression of crime or statutory offences, if the information is required for the purposes of the prosecution of an offence under an act applicable in under the Quebec Private Sector Act, an organisation may also disclose personal information, without consent, in the following circumstances, subject to certain conditionsfor the application of a collective agreement;for the collection of debts;for carrying out a mandate or performing a contract of enterprise or for services entrusted; orfor a commercial Interests of the data subjectThe Quebec Private Sector Act allows organisations to collect personal information without consent if it has a serious and legitimate reason, and either of the following conditions is metthe information is collected in the interest of the individual concerned and cannot be obtained from them in a timely manner; orcollection from a third party is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the both the Quebec Private Sector Act and the Quebec Access Act allow organisations to use personal information without consent when such use is clearly for the benefit of the acts also permit organisations to disclose personal information, without consent, to a person to whom the information must be discloseddue to the urgency of a situation that threatens the life, health, or safety of the individual; orin order to prevent an act of violence, including a suicide, where there are reasonable grounds to believe that there is a serious risk of death or serious bodily injury threatening an individual or an identifiable group of individuals, and where the nature of the threat generates a sense of urgency - in this case only the personal information that is necessary to achieve the purposes for which the information is provided may be disclosed; such information may be disclosed to any person exposed to the risk or that person's representative, and to any person who can come to that person's Public interestPlease see the sections above on legal obligations and data subject interests, which illustrate some instances where the public interest may provide a legal Legitimate interests of the data controllerConsent is not required in certain circumstances listed in Sections 6, 12, 18, and of the Quebec Private Sector Act as amended by Act 25 and Sections 59, 60, and study, research, compilation of statistics of the Quebec Access of these cases are mentioned Legal bases in other instancesNot PrinciplesThe Quebec Private Sector Act requires organisations to comply with the following requirementsaccountability organisations are responsible for protecting the personal information in their custody, and they must, among other thingsestablish and implement governance policies and practices regarding personal information that ensure the protection of such information; andpublish a privacy policy, if applicable, on the organisationâs website;identify purposes;limitation of collection 'serious and legitimate reason' and 'only the information necessary for the purposes determined before collecting it';consent and notice to the individual;limits on use, disclosure, and retention;accuracy;safeguards/confidentiality;individual access; andresponding to requests for access to personal information and rectification of personal information made by Quebec Access Act requires public bodies to comply with the same Controller and Processor Data processing notificationOrganisations are not required to notify or register with the regulatory authorities under Canadian privacy Data transfersAn organisation is responsible for personal information in its possession or custody, including information that has been transferred to a third party for disclosing personal information outside of Quebec, an organisation must conduct an assessment of privacy-related factors, taking into accountthe sensitivity of the information;the purposes for which it will be used;the safeguards that would apply to it, including contractual measures; andthe legal framework applicable in the jurisdiction where the information would be disclosed, including the degree of adequacy of the legal framework with Quebec's privacy information may be disclosed outside of Quebec only if the assessment determines that it would receive an adequate level of transfer of the information is subject to a written agreement that takes into account the results of the assessment and, if applicable, the terms agreed upon to mitigate the risks identified in the consent is not required to transfer personal information outside of the province, an individual must be informed of the possibility that the information may be disclosed outside of Quebec Access Act has the same Data processing recordsThere is no general requirement for private-sector organisations to maintain data processing an organisation must establish and implement privacy governance policies and practices. Such policies and practices must provide a framework for the retention and disposal of the information, define the roles and responsibilities of employees throughout the life cycle of the information, and provide a process for handling complaints regarding the protection of the information. Detailed information about these policies must be published on the enterprise's website in clear and simple language or, if the enterprise does not have a website, must be made available by any other appropriate certain record keeping is specifically required with respect to confidentiality incidents as noted Data protection impact assessmentAny person carrying on an enterprise must conduct an assessment of the privacy-related factors of any project for the acquisition, development, and redesign of an information system or electronic service delivery involving the collection, use, disclosure, storage, or destruction of personal information Section 95 of Act 25.Private-sector organisations must conduct an 'assessment of privacy-related factors' in the following circumstancesin connection with the acquisition, development, and redesign of any information systems project or electronic service delivery project that involves the collection, use, disclosure, storage, or destruction of personal information;before disclosing personal information outside of Quebec; andbefore disclosing personal information, without consent, to a person or body that intends to use the information for study or research purposes or for the compilation of Act 25 states that before disclosing personal information outside of QuĂ©bec, a person carrying on an enterprise must conduct an assessment of the privacy-related factors. In particular, the person must take into account Section 103 of Act 25the sensitivity of the information;the purposes for which it is to be used;the safeguards, including contractual ones, that would apply to it; andthe legal framework applicable in the state to which the information would be disclosed, including the data protection principles applicable in the foreign organisation must ensure that the project allows the computerised personal information collected from the individual to be communicated to them in a structured, commonly used, technological format. For the purpose of such an assessment, the organisation must consult the person responsible for the protection of personal information within the enterprise from the outset of the project Section 95 of Act 25, and it must be proportionate to the sensitivity of the information, the purpose for which it is to be used, and the volume, distribution, and format of the person responsible for the protection of personal information may, at any stage of a project referred to in Section 95 of Act 25, propose measures for the protection of personal information applicable to the project, such as Section 95 of Act 25the appointment of a person to be responsible for the implementation of the personal information protection measures;measures to protect the personal information in all documents related to the project;a description of the responsibilities of project participants with respect to the protection of personal information; ortraining activities for project participants on the protection of personal Quebec Access Act has the same Data protection officer appointmentUnder the Quebec Private Sector Act, the person exercising the highest authority within the organisation has the responsibility to ensure that the law is implemented and complied with. This person exercises the function of the 'person in charge of the protection of personal information' conveniently referred to thereafter as 'Privacy Officer'. All or part of this function may be delegated in writing. In addition, a committee is responsible for assisting the body in the exercise of its responsibilities and the fulfillment of its obligations under the Quebec Access CAI maintains a register of all current register of data protection officers 'DPOs' 'the Register', which includes, for each DPO, the DPO's name, address and e-mail address, and the title and contact information of the person in charge of the protection of personal information Section 145 of Act 25. The Register shall be available for public consultation during the regular business hours of the CAI. The CAI shall provide, free of charge, to any person who so requests, any extract from the Register concerning a DPO, which may be consulted on the website of the for registration shall be made in accordance with the procedure established by the CAI and shall be accompanied by the fees prescribed by regulation. An application must contain, in particular, the following information Section 1441 of Act 25the name, address, and email address of the DPO and, in the case of a legal person, the address of its head office and the names and addresses of its directors;the address, email address, and telephone number of each establishment of the DPO in QuĂ©bec;the title and contact information of the person in charge of the protection of personal information;the method of operation provided for in Section 71 of the Quebec Private Sector Act;the code of conduct provided for in Section 78 of the Quebec Private Sector Act; andthe other measures taken to ensure the confidentiality and security of personal information in accordance with the Quebec Private Sector DPO must notify the CAI of any change in the information referred to in Section 721 of the Quebec Private Sector Act no later than 30 days after the change. Where applicable, the DPO must also promptly inform the Commission, established by Section 103 of the same act, of the expected termination of the DPO's activities Section 1442 of Act 25. The application form only available in French here may be submitted by mail or DPO must establish and apply a method of operation that ensures that the information communicated by them is up to date and accurate and is communicated in accordance with the amended act Section 143 of Act 25, as well as rules of conduct that allow any person to whom personal information held by the DPO relates to, have access to the information according to a procedure that ensures the protection of the information, and to cause the information to be rectified Section 148 of Act 25.Furthermore, every two years, the DPO must inform the public, by means of a notice published in a newspaper having general circulation in each region of QuĂ©bec in which it operates Section 148 of Act 25of the fact that the DPO holds personal information relating to other persons, that the DPO communicates credit reports concerning the character, reputation, or solvency of the persons to whom the personal information relates to, persons with whom they are bound by contract, and of the fact that they receive from the latter personal information relating to other persons;the rights of access and rectification which the persons concerned may exercise under the amended act with respect to the personal information the DPO holds; andthe information provided for in Section 723 to 6 of the Quebec Private Sector the contact details of this person or the person to whom this function is delegated must be published on the company's website or, in the absence of a website, made available by any other appropriate Data breach notificationIn Quebec, there is a general obligation to report a data breach referred to as a 'confidentiality incident'.The term 'confidentiality incident' refers tothe unauthorised access, use, or disclosure of personal information; andthe loss of personal information or any other breach of the security of that there is reason to believe that a confidentiality incident has occurred, the organisation must take reasonable steps to reduce the risk of harm and to prevent new incidents of the same the event of an incident involving a risk of serious harm, the organisation must notify the CAI and any person whose personal information is affected by the incident unless doing so would impede an investigation conducted by a person or body responsible by law for the prevention, detection, or suppression of crime or statutory offence. The organisation may also notify any person or body that could mitigate the risk, by disclosing to that person or body, without the individual's consent, only the personal information necessary to do so. In the latter case, the person in charge of the protection of personal information must record the disclosure of the assessing the risk of harm, the following factors must be consideredthe sensitivity of the information;the anticipated consequences of its use; andthe likelihood that it will be used for harmful must keep a register of confidentiality incidents, which must be sent to the CAI upon a confidentiality incident is brought to its attention, the CAI may order any person, after giving them the opportunity to submit their observations, to take any measure to protect the rights of the individuals, for the time and under the conditions determined by the CAI, including the return of the compromised personal information to the organisation or its organisation that contravenes the Quebec Private Sector Act's breach notification provisions may befound guilty of an offence and fined not more than CAD 25 million approx. âŹ17 million, or the greater of 4% of its worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year doubled for a subsequent offence; orbe condemned to pay an administrative fine not exceeding CAD 10 million approx. ⏠million or the greater of 2% of its worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal the Quebec Access Act, anyone who fails to report a breach of confidentiality to the CAI or to the persons concerned when required to do so commits an offence and is liable to a fine of CAD 1,000 approx. âŹ681 to CAD 10,000 approx. âŹ6,813 in the case of a natural person, and of CAD 3,000 approx. âŹ2,044 to CAD 30,000 approx. âŹ20,438 in all other cases. Moreover, anyone who, for example, 1 impedes the progress of an inquiry or inspection of the CAI or the hearing of an application by the CAI by providing it with false or inaccurate information, by failing to provide information requested by the CAI or otherwise, or 2 fails to comply with an order of the CAI, commits an offence and is liable to a fine of CAD 5,000 approx. âŹ3,405 to CAD 100,000 approx. âŹ68,094 in the case of a natural person and of CAD 15,000 approx. âŹ10,216 to CAD 150,000 approx. âŹ102,157 in all other Data retentionUnder Quebec's privacy laws, personal information may be retained only for as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes for which it was collected or used, after which the organisation must destroy or make anonymous the information, subject to any retention period required by personal information used to make a decision about an individual must be kept for at least one year after the decision is made. Moreover, if the organisation refuses to grant a request for access or rectification, the information that is the subject of the request must be kept for as long as is necessary to allow the individual to exhaust the remedies provided by Children's dataUnder Quebec's privacy laws, personal information concerning a child under 14 years of age may not be collected from the child without the consent of the person having parental authority or the childâs guardian, unless the collection of the information is clearly for the minor's for the processing of a child's personal information is given by the person having parental authority or their guardian. If a minor is 14 years of age or older, consent is given by the minor or by the person with parental authority or their Quebec Access Act has the same Special categories of personal dataQuebec's privacy laws do not contain specific provisions regarding the processing of special categories of information. However, the application of these laws will vary depending on whether the information is sensitive and whether there are other laws that may permit or restrict the processing of such Controller and processor contractsAn organisation is responsible for protecting the personal information it holds, including information that has been transferred to a third party for the organisation discloses personal information to a third party for the purpose of 'carrying out a mandate or performing a contract of enterprise or for services entrusted to that person or body' hereafter referred to as a 'third party processor', the organisation mustentrust the mandate or contract in writing; andspecify the measures to be taken to protect the confidentiality of the personal information, to ensure that the information is used only for the purposes of carrying out the mandate or performing the contract, and to ensure that the information is not retained once the mandate or contract has third-party processor shall immediately notify the organisation's Privacy Officer of any breach or attempted breach by any person of any obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed and shall also allow the organisation's Privacy Officer to conduct any review of the confidentiality Data Subject Right to be informedThe Quebec Private Sector Act generally requires the knowledge and consent of the individual, except in certain circumstances where consent is not required. Organisations must be open and transparent about their practices and inform individuals about the information collected, used, and disclosed, and the purposes for which such information is Right to accessIndividuals have a general right to obtain access to their personal information held by organisations. Access requests must be dealt with in accordance with the applicable law and within prescribed time organisation must state the reasons for any refusal to comply with a request and indicate the provision of law on which the refusal is based, the remedies available to the applicant under the Quebec Private Sector Act, and the time limit for exercising them. If the applicant so requests, the organisation's Privacy Officer must also help them understand the Right to rectificationAn individual may, if personal information concerning them is inaccurate, incomplete, or equivocal, or if collecting, disclosing, or keeping it are not authorised by law, require that the information be organisation must give the reasons for any refusal to grant a request and indicate the provision of law on which the refusal is based, the remedies available to the applicant under the Quebec Private Sector Act, and the time limit for exercising them. If the applicant so requests, the organisation's Privacy Officer must also help them understand the Right to erasureUnder the Quebec Private Sector Act, an individual may require an organisation tocease disseminating personal information about them;de-index any hyperlink that provides access to that information, if the dissemination violates the law or a court order; andre-index any hyperlink that provides access to that a request may be made when the following conditions are metthe dissemination of such information would cause the person serious harm in relation to the person's right to respect of their reputation or privacy;the harm is clearly greater than the publicâs interest in knowing the information or the right to freedom of expression the balance of convenience criterion; andthe relief sought does not exceed what is necessary to prevent the continuation of the assessing the balance of convenience criterion, the following, in particular, must be taken into accountthe fact that the person concerned is a public figure;the fact that the information concerns the person when they are a minor;the fact that the information is up to date and accurate;the sensitivity of the information;the context in which the information is disseminated;the time elapsed between the dissemination of the information and the request made; andwhere the information concerns a criminal or penal procedure, the obtaining of a pardon or the application of a restriction on the accessibility of records of the courts of Right to object/opt-outIndividuals have the right to submit complaints to organisations, to withdraw consent subject to some limitations, and to file complaints with the CAI. Although not explicitly stated in the Quebec Private Sector Act, it is understood that implied consent is permitted for non-sensitive personal Right to data portabilityUnder the Quebec Private Sector Act, an individual may request a copy of computerised personal information in the form of a written and intelligible transcript. Unless there are serious practical difficulties in doing so, computerised personal information collected from the applicant and not information created or derived from their personal information must, at their request, be disclosed to them in a structured, commonly used technological format. The information must also be disclosed, at the applicant's request, to any person or body authorised by law to collect such Right not to be subject to automated decision-makingUnder the Quebec Private Sector Act, an organisation that uses personal information to make a decision based solely on the automated processing of such information must, at or before the time of the decision, or at the latest at the time the decision is communicated to the individual, inform the individual of the request, the individual must also be informed ofthe personal information used to reach the decision;the reasons and the main factors and parameters that led to the decision; andthe right of the person concerned to have the personal information used to make the decision individual must be given the opportunity to submit observations to a staff member who is in a position to review the Quebec Access Act has the same Other rightsIn addition to the other rights mentioned therein, it should be noted that Act 25 requires organisations to disclose, in advance, their use of technology that can identify, locate, or profile users, and then provide users with the means to activate the identification, location, or profiling features. 'Profiling' is defined as the collection and use of personal information to assess certain characteristics of a natural person, such as work performance, economic situation, health, personal preferences, interests, or of note, the spouse or a close relative of a deceased person may request personal information concerning the deceased if the following conditions are metknowledge of the information could help the applicant in the grieving process; andif the deceased person did not record in writing their refusal to grant such a right of PenaltiesThe CAI has the power to impose monetary administrative penalties and to issue fines for penal the Quebec Private Sector Act, monetary administrative penalties may be imposed on organisations for the following reasonsfailure to adequately notify the individuals;unlawful collection, use, disclosure, retention, or destruction of personal information;failure to report a confidentiality incident;failure to take the necessary security measures to ensure the protection of the personal information; andfailure to notify individuals concerned by a decision based exclusively on an automated process or failure to provide individuals an opportunity to submit maximum amount of the monetary administrative penalty is CAD 50,000 approx. âŹ34,048 for individuals and CAD 10 million approx. ⏠million for businesses or 2% of the previous year's worldwide turnover, whichever is 25 provides that businesses may acknowledge their non-compliance with applicable laws and enter into an undertaking with the CAI to remedy the non-compliance or mitigate its consequences. If such an undertaking is accepted and complied with by the CAI, the business may not be subject to a monetary administrative penalty with respect to the acts or omissions covered by the the Quebec Private Sector Act, the CAI may institute criminal proceedings, within five years of the commission of the offense, for the following offenses, among othersunlawful collection, use, disclosure, retention, or destruction of personal information;failure to report a confidentiality incident;failure to take the necessary security measures to ensure the protection of the personal information;identifying or attempting to identify a natural person using de-identified information without authorisation;impeding the progress of an inquiry or inspection by the CAI or the hearing of an application by the CAI by providing it with false or inaccurate information, by failing to provide information requested by the CAI, or otherwise; andfailure to comply with an order of the maximum amount of the fine for a penal offence is of CAD 5,000 approx. âŹ3,406 to CAD 100,000 approx. âŹ68,106 in the case of a natural person and, in all other cases, of CAD 15,000 approx. âŹ10,216 to CAD 25 million approx. âŹ17 million, or the greater of 4% of its worldwide turnover in the preceding fiscal year. In the event of a repeat violation, the fines will be Quebec Private Sector Act also provides that where an individual has suffered an injury as a result of an unlawful infringement of the rights conferred by the Quebec Private Sector Act or by Sections 35 to 40 of the Quebec Civil Code, and where the violation is intentional or results from gross negligence, the court shall also award punitive damages of at least CAD 1,000 approx. âŹ681. Enforcement decisionsThe penal provisions of the Quebec Private Sector Act have never been enforced to date. However, the significant increase in the penalties provided recently introduced by Act 25 sends a signal that the penal provisions may play an important role in the enforcement of Quebec's privacy law administrative monetary penalties introduced by Act 25 are new and no enforcement decisions have yet been issued.
Stateand territory regulators. Charities' reporting requirements and responsibilities can vary in each state or territory in relation to: fundraising. state taxes. local government permits and permissions. further general obligations (including employment, trading, occupational health and safety and anti-discrimination requirements).
Montreal is Quebec's most populous city, the financial center, and a thriving multicultural hub of activity. Quebec City, situated 158 miles 255 kilometers up the Saint Lawrence River, is a unique and historic city as well as the provincial capital. Canada does not have high-speed trains, so whether you drive, use a bus, or take the train, it will take you about three hours to travel between Montreal and Quebec City. If you are traveling during the busy holiday season, taking the train may be faster than driving or taking the bus because at least you won't get stuck in traffic. If you're in a rush, it's a 45-minute flight between the cities, but you should also factor in how much time it will take you to get to and from the airport. If saving money is your priority, the bus is the best choice. Ultimately, deciding which way to get from Montreal to Quebec City comes down to two factors price and travel style. Time Cost Best For Train 3 hours, 15 minutes from $40 Enjoying the journey Bus 3 hours, 15 minutes from $25 Traveling on a budget Flight 45 minutes from $90 one-way Arriving quickly Car 2 hours, 45 minutes 158 miles 255 kilometers Exploring along the way What Is the Cheapest Way to Get From Montreal to Quebec City? For the cheapest transport, taking a bus is the best option, but only if you book tickets early. OrlĂ©ans Express is the only bus company that operates regular service between Montreal and Quebec City, with one or two stops in between. If you buy your tickets early enough, the promotional price is just $25. However, these tickets quickly sell out and you may have to pay the full fare, which is about $56. Buses leave about once an hour from 10 to 11 and feature reclining seats, free Wi-Fi, an onboard bathroom, and electrical outlets. Accounting for traffic, you should expect the ride to take between three to four hours. For the best prices, OrlĂ©ans Express recommends booking your ticket at least eight days in advance. What Is the Fastest Way to Get From Montreal to Quebec City? Flying is the fastest way to get to Quebec City. The flight is only 45 minutes, so it's ideal for travelers who are on a tight schedule. However, once you factor in all of the additional time to get to and from the airport and navigate security, the time difference between flying and driving may not be that significant. Air Canada, PAL Airlines, and regional airline Pascan, all operate direct flights between Montreal and Quebec City. One-way flights typically start around $90 but prices can skyrockets if you don't book well in advance, or book with a smaller air carrier. You're more likely to find lower fares if you book at least a month or two in advance. Most flights leave from MontrĂ©al-Trudeau International Airport, which is about a 30-minute drive or a 40-minute train ride from the Montreal Bus Terminal. However, Pascan flights are non-commercial 15-passenger planes that leave from the much smaller Saint-Hubert Longueuil Airport, so make sure you pay attention to which airport you're leaving from when buying your tickets. Tickets purchased through Pascan also tend to be more expensive than those bought with Air Canada or PAL How Long Does It Take to Drive? There are two main options for driving between Montreal and Quebec City, both of which take about three hours. The slightly quicker route is along Highway 20 on the south shore of the Saint Lawrence River; however, this route is dull and lacking charm. One advantage of taking this route is the authentic poutine at Fromagerie Lemaire just outside of Drummondville. Being a cheese-making operation, the cheese curds are homemade and the french fries, of course, are fresh cut. The north shore route along Highway 40 is slightly more scenic, as it runs closer to the river shore and has more small towns with pretty double-spired churches. Trois-Rivieres, about halfway between Montreal and Quebec City, makes a pleasant stop on the north shore. Be aware that driving in Quebec in winter can be challenging, especially for inexperienced drivers. Snow tires are mandatory in Quebec for a reason, so educate yourself on proper winter driving and make sure you're familiar with the rules of the road of driving in Canada. How Long Is the Train Ride? VIA Rail is Canada's national passenger railway and provides daily service between downtown Montreal and Quebec City. Depending on how many stops there are on your itinerary, the journey should only take between three and four hours. And while the train ride is not particularly scenic, it is comfortable, reliable, and convenient. VIA Rail offers five different ticket classes Escape, Economy, Economy Plus, Business, and Business Plus. Escape fares are the cheapest because they are non-refundable, while Business and Business Plus fares are refundable and include complimentary meals, lounge access, and priority boarding. No matter which fare you choose, you will be able to access and use the train's complimentary Wi-Fi. When Is the Best Time to Travel to Quebec City? Since winter is brutally cold, the best time to visit Quebec City is in the summer. The weather is warm but rarely uncomfortably hot, and the locals take full advantage of the sunshine by hosting back-to-back festivals all season long. Of course, summer is also the tourist high season, and transportation methods all go up in price along with hotels. Aim for visiting in May or early June to balance out good weather with fewer crowds. If you can withstand the freezing temperatures, winter in Quebec City offers its own special charm. The nearby mountains are open for skiing and the February Winter Carnival is one of the biggest annual events in the city. Can I Use Public Transportation to Travel From the Airport? The QuĂ©bec City Jean Lesage International Airport is 9 miles 15 kilometers from downtown Quebec City, which is about a 25-minute drive. Unlike Montreal, there's no train service from the airport so your only public transportation option is to take the bus, which will most likely require at least one transfer and will take you over an hour. Compared to other city airports, Quebec City's Airport is not too far out of the way and it's probably worth it to take a cab or ride-share to your hotel. What Is There to Do in Quebec City? With cobblestone streets, fortified walls, and castles, Quebec City is probably North America's most European city. The historic district has even been declared UNESCO World Heritage site and is the third oldest city on the continent. The city's main tourist attractions are La Citadelle de QuĂ©bec, the Parliament building, and Montmorency Falls, just outside of downtown. For the best view of the city skyline, head to Pierre-Dugua-De-Mons Terrace. There are also a number of museums worth visiting such as the Museum of Civilization, the Ărico Chocolate Museum, and more. A guided tour may be a good idea if you want to make the most of your trip and learn as much as you can. The Quebec City and Montmorency Falls daytrip from Montreal is a full-day sightseeing tour with a local licensed guide, highlighting Quebec City's top attractions. Another option that allows more time in Quebec City is a two-day guided tour of Quebec City and Tadoussac, leaving from Montreal. Get a guided tour of historic Quebec City plus time to spend on your own. âAfter the scenic drive to Tadoussac, hop on board a whale watching vessel, and keep an eye out for the belugas, minkes, and humpbacks that dwell in the St. Lawrence waters. Frequently Asked Questions How far is it from Montreal to Quebec City? Quebec City is 158 miles up the Saint Lawrence River, northeast of Montreal. How long is the drive from Montreal to Quebec City? There are two main options for driving between Montreal and Quebec City, both of which take about three hours. The slightly quicker way is along Highway 20 on the south shore of the Saint Lawrence River, while the north shore route along Highway 40 is slightly more scenic. How long is the train from Montreal to Quebec City? Depending on how many stops there are on your itinerary, the journey from Montreal to Quebec City should only take between three and four hours.
SonestaInternational Hotels Corporation Suite Summer Sweepstakes Official Rules NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE, PAYMENT OR DONATION WILL NOT INCREASE OR IMPROVE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. 1. ELIGIBILITY. The Sonesta International Hotels Corporation ("Sponsor") "Suite Summer Sweepstakes" (the "Promotion") is only open to those who, as of the start
First published 12 November 2008 Citations 2 Abstract Much of what constitutes the business of international relations is undertaken by states in response to their perceived self-interest, and the commitments of states create duties and obligations. This paper assesses critical values that permeate substantive understanding of state duties and obligations. It explores how states traditionally gain community standing and how their choices bind them to existing community norms, even though some are often contested. Assuming a state to be a bona-fide and recognized member of the international community, its self-interested activities, praise-worthy or controversial, create obligation, a moral and legal duty recognized and actionable by law. In practice, what actually constitutes obligation may not be the same in all situations, or be fulfilled similarly by the same parties, or confer the same rights. It is difficult to establish a uniform reference with which to grapple with state obligation across all situations. This difficulty, however, does not enlighten debates on state responsibilities with regard to the binding force of international law where human rights abuses and other moral/legal violations are concerned. The argument is presented that since community membership, statehood, and state capacity provide the prima-facie basis for state obligation, attempts by rogue states to raise and frame secondary issues of sovereignty and autonomy in order to fence-out noncompliance are invalid States, therefore, are obligated and duty bound by community norms despite subsequent defenses that are raised in an effort to expunge transgressions. References Citing Literature
Inaddition to the general and cross-cutting obligations and principles exposed in the preceding section, the CESCR has identified three types or levels of obligations that apply to the substantive rights under the ICESCR: 1) The obligation to respect, requiring States to refrain from measures or conduct that hinder or prevent the enjoyment of rights; 2) The obligation to protect, which requires States to act to prevent third parties, such as businesses or armed groups, from interfering with
Authors Hugo-Pierre Gagnon, Alain Fournier, Julien Ranger, Alexandre Fallon, Julien Morissette, Asma Berrak January 2023 QuĂ©bec is Canadaâs largest province by area and its second most populous province. QuĂ©becâs strategic location offers unique opportunities to investors and business owners in neighbouring urban centers such as New York, Boston and Toronto. Foreign entities considering doing business in QuĂ©bec have to take into consideration its distinct language, culture and legal systems, as well as its diverse forms of business organization. In fact, according to the Office quĂ©bĂ©coise de la langue française, more than 93% of the population speaks French. QuĂ©bec has various French language requirements, described below, that foreign businesses getting established in QuĂ©bec must adhere to. QuĂ©bec, unlike the other provinces of Canada, is a civil law jurisdiction where most relationships between individuals and private entities are ruled by the provisions of the Civil Code of QuĂ©bec CCQ. Forms of business organization There are various legal forms to select from to structure a business in QuĂ©bec, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In order to select the most appropriate form, a foreign entity must consider key factors such as its tax implications, the role of investors within the company and all liability questions regarding obligations contracted for the service or operation of the business. Branch versus subsidiary operation One of the key initial considerations for establishing a business in QuĂ©bec is whether the entity will undertake its business directly as a branch of the foreign organization or whether it will carry on the business as a separate QuĂ©bec subsidiary. Since the use of a branch office exposes the foreign company to provincial QuĂ©bec and federal Canadian laws, the creation of a wholly owned subsidiary in the home jurisdiction of the foreign corporation should be considered. That subsidiary would then carry on business in QuĂ©bec as well as in other Canadian provinces or territories in which the foreign corporation desires to conduct business through a branch. Depending on the laws in the home jurisdiction, the foreign parent might then avoid direct liability for actions of the QuĂ©bec operation. Foreign corporations doing business in QuĂ©bec through a branch are subject to certain tax obligations in QuĂ©bec as well as in Canada, such as producing tax returns. In particular, the foreign corporation would be subject to branch tax and could also be subject to withholding taxes in respect of certain payments that it receives from Canadian taxpayers. Use of a branch operation in QuĂ©bec requires registration with QuĂ©becâs Registraire des entreprises Enterprise Registrar and, if it operates in other Canadian provinces or territories, an application in each of those jurisdictions for extraâprovincial registration is required. Some provinces and territories, such as QuĂ©bec, require that an âagent for serviceâ or âattorney for serviceâ be appointed in that province or territory for registration purposes. In QuĂ©bec, an attorney for service is required when the corporation applying for registration does not have a head office address or an establishment in the province. In addition, the business or corporate name under which registration in QuĂ©bec is granted must be approved by the Registraire des entreprises and comply with the Charter of the French Language see âThe Charter of the French Languageâ, below. A foreign corporation may also do business in QuĂ©bec through a QuĂ©bec subsidiary. In this case, the QuĂ©bec subsidiary would be obliged to file both Canadian and QuĂ©bec tax returns. However, the QuĂ©bec subsidiary would generally not be subject to withholding taxes in respect of payments received from Canadian taxpayers. Foreign tax considerations could also play a role in the choice to start an enterprise by means of a branch or subsidiary in QuĂ©bec. It is possible in certain circumstances to transfer the assets of the branch in favour of the QuĂ©bec subsidiary on a taxâfree basis for both Canadian and QuĂ©bec tax purposes. Incorporation in QuĂ©bec Entities wishing to incorporate in QuĂ©bec have the choice between using the provincial regime under the Business Corporations Act QuĂ©bec QBCA or the federal regime under the Canada Business Corporations Act CBCA. Unless otherwise noted, the discussion in this section focuses on QBCA incorporation. If a foreign entity decides to incorporate a subsidiary in QuĂ©bec, such incorporation is, generally speaking, a very simple process and does not require any substantive government approvals. A simple filing is required, and the company must be registered with various government, tax and other agencies. Although there are tax rules that should be considered, there are no approvals required for the capitalization of a corporation. Regarding the share capital and other financial information about the corporation, they do not have to be publicly disclosed unless the corporation is a publicly listed company its shares are available to the public. Regardless of the regime, the corporation must disclose the names and domiciles of the three shareholders controlling the greatest number of votes and identify the shareholder holding an absolute majority. Generally, a QuĂ©bec corporation has the capacity and the power of a natural person. It may also carry on business anywhere in Canada and use its name in any Canadian province or territory. The QBCA, which came into effect in 2011 and modernized QuĂ©becâs corporate laws, applies to all businesses incorporated under QuĂ©bec law. Its enactment introduced important changes to the way business is done in QuĂ©bec, which distinguish it from other jurisdictions and demonstrate the provinceâs commitment to being a businessâoriented jurisdiction. The following three points highlight some of the QBCAâs most salient features in terms of flexibility. 1. The board of directors residency and meetings There is no residency requirement for directors of a business incorporated under the QBCA. A QuĂ©bec corporation may therefore have a board consisting entirely of foreign directors. This permissive regulation contrasts sharply with the CBCA, which requires that at least 25% of a corporationâs directors be Canadian residents. Both the QBCA and the CBCA allow board meetings to occur anywhere; they therefore need not be conducted in the home jurisdiction of the business. Further, in both jurisdictions, directors may participate in meetings by electronic means and any director doing so is deemed present at the meeting. Finally, a majority of directors in office constitutes quorum at any meeting of the board, and a quorum of directors may exercise all the powers of the directors. However, it is important to note that the residency requirement under the CBCA extends to quorum â generally speaking, at least 25% of the directors present at a meeting must be Canadian residents for the board to be able to transact any business. Such restrictions do not exist for QBCA corporations. 2. Flexible issuance of shares The issuance of shares in QuĂ©bec is flexible in several important regards First, shares may be issued whether or not they are fully paid when not fully paid, shares will be subject to calls for payment as prescribed in the corporationâs byâlaws; if the shareholder fails to make the required payment once called, the board may confiscate the shares in question without further formality. Second, a corporation may, by a unanimous resolution of the shareholders, validate any irregular issuance of shares that exceeds the corporationâs authorized share capital. Third, a corporation may issue shares by ordinary resolution of the board of directors. These flexible aspects of the share capital of a QuĂ©bec corporation are not provided for in the CBCA, which requires shares to be fully paid upon issuance. These properties also distinguish QuĂ©bec from certain foreign jurisdictions, where any issuance of shares requires both shareholder approval at a duly convened meeting and the blocking of corporate funds with a notary prior to any capital increase. Neither such formality exists in QuĂ©bec. 3. Continuance The advent of the QBCA brought with it the possibility of continuance; that is, corporations constituted under foreign laws, such as the CBCA or the corporate statutes of other Canadian provinces or territories, may now be continued as corporations under the QBCA, all with relative ease. The reverse also holds true. This innovation increases QuĂ©becâs appeal as a jurisdiction open to corporate reorganizations that include amalgamations and reinforces its outwardâlooking orientation. Required Declarations According to the Act respecting the legal publicity of enterprises ALPE, any legal person established in QuĂ©bec, whether constituted in QuĂ©bec under the QBCA, or if they are domiciled in QuĂ©bec, carry on activity in QuĂ©bec under CBCA or possess an immovable real right registrant, must update their information contained in the register by filing a declaration generally within 30 days after the date on which any change occurs. Additionally, once a year, six months after the end date of its taxation year, a registrant must file an updating declaration stating that the information contained in the register is accurate or, as applicable, stating what changes should be made. This obligation begins the year following the year in which the corporation is first registered. The annual declaration must be filed with the annual registration fee set out in Schedule 1 of the ALPE. This obligation begins the second year following the year in which the corporation is first registered. In other words, there are no fees for the first year after its constitution. The corporation can file its annual declaration at the same time as its tax return. Partnerships and joint ventures In certain circumstances, the use of a partnership or joint venture, in combination with one or more persons or corporations in QuĂ©bec, may be an attractive option from a tax perspective. The option may, however, be unattractive in other circumstances because the existence of a nonâQuĂ©bec partner may cause payments to or from the partnership to be subject to withholding tax. If a nonresident holds its partnership or joint venture interest through a subsidiary incorporated in QuĂ©bec, tax considerations noted above for subsidiaries are relevant. Participation of a nonâresident in a partnership or joint venture directly for foreign tax or other reasons is generally equivalent to operating through a branch in QuĂ©bec. In QuĂ©bec, general partnerships allow all partners to participate equally in the management of the partnership, but they must also share in any liabilities the partnership may incur. By contrast, limited partnerships have two tiers of partner at least one general partner who manages the business and is liable for the totality of the limited partnershipâs debts and obligations, and limited or âspecialâ partners, who do not participate in management duties and whose liability is limited to the extent of their respective investments in the limited partnership. For this reason, limited partnerships can be an attractive option for investors. A detailed partnership agreement is customary in the case of a partnership, in part to avoid certain legislative provisions that would otherwise apply. Limited partnerships are commonly used for investment purposes to allow limited partners to benefit from the transparency of the partnership for tax purposes and to benefit indirectly from tax deductions, all while retaining their limited liability. Structuring the partnership so that the general partner with unlimited liability is a corporation preserves all of the limited liability aspects of the corporate form. The provisions of the CCQ with respect to limited partnerships are similar to comparable statutes in other Canadian provinces and in various states in the In QuĂ©bec, however, partnerships have certain legal characteristics that differentiate them from partnerships in many common law jurisdictions by the fact that they have separate patrimonies from those of their partners. In QuĂ©bec, every person natural and legal has a patrimony, which is that personâs universality of rights and obligations having a pecuniary value, in which the rights guarantee the obligations. Because QuĂ©bec partnerships have a patrimony, they have the capacity, even though they are not legal persons, to own their own assets, incur their own liabilities and appear in court in their own right, among other things. Limited partnerships should not be confused with limited liability partnerships LLPs. LLPs are typically formed by professionals such as accountants and lawyers, and indeed they derive from a combination of the rules governing general partnerships in the CCQ and specific rules found in QuĂ©becâs Professional Code. As a result of this hybrid formation, LLPs do not have general partners and individual partners retain liability for their respective acts and omissions. True joint ventures or coâownership arrangements, commonly involving one or more corporations, avoid the unlimited joint and several liability applicable to partners. They also permit the venturers or coâ owners to regulate their tax deductions without being forced to do so on the same basis as other coâ venturers. This would not be possible in the case of a partnership. A joint venture agreement must be carefully drafted to ensure that the venture is not considered a partnership. Franchising law In Canada, franchising is regulated on a provincial level. Unlike certain other provinces, QuĂ©bec has no franchiseâspecific legislation. However, this form of business organization is not unregulated; the general provisions of the CCQ and the Charter of the French Language Charter apply. This section will focus on three important considerations under the CCQ; for the impact of the Charter, see âThe Charter of the French Language,â below. First, the CCQ imposes a duty of good faith, which is broader than the duty of fair dealing found in many common law jurisdictions, including other Canadian provinces. In QuĂ©bec, the duty of good faith applies not only to the performance and enforcement of franchise agreements, but as also to their negotiation. Further, the duty of good faith often requires one party for instance, the franchisor to disclose material facts to the other, the franchisee, when it would otherwise not be in its interest to do so. Finally, the duty of good faith precludes a party from exercising its contractual rights in an excessive and unreasonable manner or with the intent of injuring the other. It is also a unique feature of QuĂ©bec law that courts can read in âimplied obligationsâ into contracts. In one instance, the Courts found that in the context of a franchise agreement, there is an implied obligation to âprotect and enhance the brandâ, and that the franchisor can be liable for damages for failing to do so. Our summary of this case, Bertico Inc. et al. v Dunkinâ Brands Canada Ltd. Allied Domecq Retailing International Canada Ltd., can be found here. Second, the CCQ governs franchising through its provisions relating to âcontracts of adhesion.â A contract of adhesion is a contract in which the essential stipulations were imposed or drafted by one of the parties and were nonânegotiable. To the extent that franchise agreements fit this definition, they are subject to certain legislative checks imposed to protect the adhering party, in this case the franchisee. Thus, such agreements must be drafted in clear language and any ambiguity will be interpreted in favour of the franchisee. Further, external clauses that are separate from the franchise agreement itself and that were not expressly brought to the attention of the franchisee before signing risk being found null in QuĂ©bec courts. But clarity and express mention are not enough clauses that are found to be âabusiveâ or excessively onerous may also be found null or see their obligations reduced by the courts. Finally, as of June 1, 2023, all contracts of adhesion must be systematically provided to the other party at least in French, failing which they could be declared null by the courts on request on that basis alone. Third, in the context of the sale of goods, the CCQ obliges manufacturers, distributors and suppliers to warrant the quality and ownership of the goods in the same manner as the seller. As a result, it is possible for the franchisor who, for instance, is also a manufacturer, to be held liable for defective goods sold by its franchisee. Such responsibility can arise either indirectly, by the franchisee holding the franchisor responsible in warranty after being sued by the consumer, or directly, by the consumer pursuing the franchisor even though there is no contractual relationship between them. The CCQ limits the franchisorâs ability to disclaim such warranties with respect to both the franchisee and the consumer, and the Consumer Protection Act QuĂ©bec adds additional protections for the latter. The Charter of the French Language The Charter establishes French as the official language of QuĂ©bec and governs the use of the French language in a broad range of activities. In particular, it sets forth the fundamental right of every person to have all firms doing business in QuĂ©bec communicate with them in French. The Office quĂ©bĂ©cois de la langue française OQLF is the provincial authority that oversees the use of French in commerce and business. The OQLF considers that a firm maintaining an address in QuĂ©bec or conducting business in QuĂ©bec by soliciting QuĂ©bec residents is carrying on business in QuĂ©bec and, therefore, is subject to the Charter. The government of QuĂ©bec recently adopted numerous amendments under Bill 96 to the current Charter, most of which became effective as of June 1st, 2022. These changes include broader requirements for all businesses to communicate with their QuĂ©bec employees in French, and in particular a new requirement for all businesses with QuĂ©bec employees to provide written training materials in French. stricter requirements in respect of the publication of job offers in French, by requiring businesses to publish the French version of job offers for QuĂ©bec positions in a comparable manner to the publication of the English version. new limits on the ability of businesses to require the knowledge of a language other than French for QuĂ©bec positions businesses will now be required to carry out an assessment of the actual language needs associated with the duties of the position, examine whether existing employees who already have knowledge of the other language could perform those duties that require knowledge of the other language and generally concentrate the duties requiring knowledge of another language in the fewest possible number of positions. a new requirement for all businesses to inform and serve their QuĂ©bec clients both consumers and non-consumers in French. requiring, as a condition of validity that all adhesion contracts contracts that are non-negotiable and consumer contracts be systematically provided in French to counterparties in QuĂ©bec. limiting the use of trademarks that contain text in a language other than French in commercial advertising and on products, by requiring that such trademarks be registered under the Trademarks Act in order to be used in QuĂ©bec. This effectively puts an end to the ability of businesses to use common law unregistered trademarks containing text in a language other than French in their commercial advertising and on products in QuĂ©bec. modifying signage standards for premises by requiring that the French text that accompanies a trademark containing text in a language that is not in French be âmarkedly predominantâ in relation to the non-French text. This essentially requires the size of the French signage that must already accompany any non-French trademark on premises to be increased to twice the size of the non-French trademark. reducing the threshold at which businesses become subject to the obligation to undergo a âfrancization programâ seeking to generalize the use of French within the businessesâ QuĂ©bec operations from 50 to 25 employees in QuĂ©bec. increasing the enforcement powers of the regulator charged with the application of the Charter, the OQLF, including broader inspection powers, new order-making powers and the standing to seek the assistance of the Courts directly for the enforcement of the Charter. instituting a new private right of action for all QuĂ©bec residents to seek injunctive relief, damages and punitive damages for violations of the provisions of the Charter. Corporation name in French The ALPE, the QBCA and the Charter require companies carrying on business in QuĂ©bec to have a corporation name in French. A corporationâs name should not be confused with its trademark; the latter is not required to have a French version, as long as it is registered under the federal Trademarks Act, if the trademark is to be used in commercial advertising and on products. An example helps to illustrate this distinction imagine a retailer doing business under the trademark âEnglish.â This retailer would have to register a French company name, such as âMagasins English inc.â âMagasinsâ meaning âstoresâ in French; however, in that retailerâs public signage, packaging and publicity, it would be allowed to use its trademark âEnglishâ alone, provided it was registered under the federal Trademarks Act. With respect to signage, though, new measures have been adopted that require âmarked predominance of Frenchâ. These measures are explained in further detail below. Common business applications in French Product labelling Every inscription on a product, its container or wrapping, or on a leaflet, brochure or card supplied with it, including the directions for use and warranty certificate, must be drafted in French. This requirement extends to labels containing, for example, washing instructions and sizes. The French text can be accompanied by text in another language, so long as the text in the other language is not more prominent than the French text. Employment forms, order forms, invoices, etc. Employment application forms, order forms, invoices, receipts, catalogues, brochures and other similar, consumerâfacing documents must be produced in French or in a bilingual version. Under Bill 96, employers will be required to publish in French any offer of employment, transfer, promotion, employment application form, documents relating to conditions of employment and training documents produced for the staff. In addition, any individual employment contract the employer enters into in writing has to be drawn up in French, unless the employee prefers English. However, where the employment agreement is non-negotiable, a French version must be systematically provided to the employee, even when they prefers an English version. Provided a French version was given to the employee, the contract can be concluded in English if that is the employeeâs preference. These proposed changes to the Charter will increase the regulatory burden in respect of hiring and maintaining employees in QuĂ©bec. Before requiring knowledge of English as a condition of employment, businesses will have to conduct an assessment as to why that condition is required and document it. More attention will have to be given to communications and materials provided to QuĂ©bec employees generally, as the scope of what has to be in French will increase. Practically speaking, businesses may want to consider what is truly required for their QuĂ©bec operations in terms of written materials and only provide to QuĂ©bec employees what is strictly required, as a way of reducing the translation burden. Public signs, posters and commercial advertising Public signs, posters and commercial advertising may also be bilingual, provided that the French translation is âmarkedly predominant.â Under Bill 96, a trademark may be drawn up, even partially, only in a language other than French, provided the trademark is registered within the meaning of the Trademarks Act and no corresponding French version appears in the register kept according to that Act. However, on public signs and posters visible from outside premises, French must be markedly predominant where such a trademark appears in a language other than French. In certain situations, such as, large billboards or signs that are visible from any part of a public highway, and advertising on public transportation vehicles, such as buses and subways, signage must be exclusively in French. Websites Commercial advertising posted on a website must also be in French. Alternatively, it may be bilingual, provided that the French version is displayed at least as prominently as the English version. In practice, the OQLF requires that the French and English versions of a corporationâs Canadian website be equivalent. Trademarks Previously, any ârecognizedâ trademark within the meaning of the Canadian Trademarks Act which includes both registered and unregistered marks enjoyed an exception to the bilingual requirement in a businessâs catalogues, brochures, public signs, posters and commercial advertising, provided that a French version of such trademark had not been registered. Several years ago, the OQLF advanced a more restrictive interpretation of its regulation regarding this exception by claiming that a trademark name needed to be accompanied by a generic descriptive in French Les magasins Best Buy. On April 9, 2014, in Magasins Best Buy LtĂ©e v. QuĂ©bec Procureur gĂ©nĂ©ral, the QuĂ©bec Superior Court found that the broader interpretation of the exception should prevail and that a trademark name can be used alone. This decision was subsequently confirmed by the Court of Appeal. In light of these judgments, the OQLF made regulatory amendments that came into force on November 24, 2016. Under the amendments, businesses are still able to use and display recognized trademarks in English, provided that a French version has not been registered. However, a trademark displayed in English only âoutside an immovableâ real property â including outside a store in an indoor shopping mall âmust be accompanied by a âsufficient presence of French.â This can be in the form of i a generic term or a description of the products or services concerned; ii a slogan; or iii any other term or indication deemed sufficient. The âsufficient presence of Frenchâ must also have permanent visibility and legibility in the same visual field as the English trademark. This is a flexible requirement. For example, an English trademark can be used without a French description if there is a permanent display in French of information on the products or services offered. This could include a simple storefront window display. However, with Bill 96, the requirements are again changing, effective June 1, 2025. First, only trademarks that are registered under the Trademarks Act can be used on signage if they contain text in a language other than French. Recognized, but unregistered trademarks often referred to as common law marks will no longer be allowed at all if they contain text in a language other than French. Moreover, the display of a registered trademark that contains text in a language other than French outside premises will only be allowed if it is accompanied by French text that takes up twice the surface area occupied by the text in another language, and the font of the French text must be twice the size of the font of any text in another language. Language as a condition of employment Employers are prohibited from dismissing, laying off, demoting or transferring a staff member for the sole reason that they are exclusively Frenchâspeaking or have insufficient knowledge of the English language. An employer is prohibited from making knowledge of the English language a condition of obtaining employment, unless the nature of the duties requires such knowledge. The amendments adopted under Bill 96 make it so that an employer is deemed not to have taken all reasonable means to avoid requiring knowledge or a specific level of knowledge of a language other than the official language if, before requiring such knowledge or such a level of knowledge, one of the following conditions is not met 1 the employer assessed the actual language needs associated with the duties to be performed; 2 the employer made sure that the language knowledge already required from other staff members was insufficient for the performance of those duties; or 3 the employer restricted as much as possible the number of positions involving duties whose performance requires knowledge or a specific level of knowledge of a language other than the official language. Francization programs An enterprise in QuĂ©bec that employs more than 50 employees in QuĂ©bec must register with the OQLF. Under Bill 96, this threshold will be lowered to 25 employees, as of June 1, 2025. If the OQLF considers that the use of French is not generalized at all levels of the enterprise, the enterprise will have to adopt a francization program. The francization program includes managerial staff and the OQLF considers the total number of employees who are located in QuĂ©bec, even those who may be located at different locations within the province. It is important to note, however, that these measures and requirements do not have to be met on day one. They may be implemented gradually, over a certain period of time. An enterprise employing 100 or more persons must form a francization committee. Where necessary, the committee will have to devise a francization program and supervise its implementation. Certificates of francization will be issued in each case where the OQLF is satisfied with the enterpriseâs linguistic situation. Penalties for non-compliance Any entity that contravenes the Charter is liable for each offence to a fine of $3,000 to $30,000. The fines are doubled for a second offence and tripled for subsequent offences. Liability extends to those distributing, selling by retail trade, renting, offering for sale or rental, or otherwise marketing a product, a computer software, or a publication not in compliance with the Charter. A judge may also, upon request, impose an additional fine equal to the financial gain realized and grant injunctive relief to have the violation cease. Bill 96 also introduces a private right of action in favour of all QuĂ©bec residents, whereby they can seek damages, including punitive damages, and injunctive relief in respect of Charter violations. In certain circumstances, QuĂ©bec clients can ask the court to annul contracts that were not provided to them in French. Public contracts In certain instances, businesses operating in QuĂ©bec are required to obtain authorization from the AutoritĂ© des marchĂ©s publics AMP in order to be eligible to compete in a public call for tenders or award process to enter into contracts with a QuĂ©bec government department or agency. In addition, an enterprise that wishes to enter into a contract with a public body involving an expenditure, including an expenditure resulting from an option provided in the contract, equal to or greater than the amount determined by the government must obtain an authorization for that purpose from the AMP. The amount may vary according to the category of contract. The word "must" has been misplaced. According to the Act respecting contracting by public bodies, it is placed before "obtain". The provincial threshold is set at $5 million for construction contracts and subcontracts or public-private partnership agreements and $1 million for service contracts and subcontracts entered into pursuant to a call for tenders or by mutual agreement. The threshold includes, if applicable, the amount of the expenditure that would be incurred if all renewal options were exercised. Additionally, all such businesses must have an Attestation de Revenu QuĂ©bec, which can be obtained online at My Account for businesses. Businesses that wish to enter into a public contract must comply with all other conditions and obligations under the Act respecting contracting by public bodies. Privacy An enterprise in QuĂ©bec that collects, holds, uses or communicates any personal information, meaning any information which relates to a natural person and allows that person to be identified, is subject to the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, QuĂ©bec Privacy Act. On September 22, 2021, the Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information was adopted. It significantly amends the QuĂ©bec Privacy Act over a three-year time frame. As briefly discussed below, new rules include severe monetary penalties, a security incident reporting regime, new statutory rights and compliance obligations, and a range of other amendments affecting private sector organizations. The new requirements and individual rights are similar to those which are in force in the European Union pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation GDPR. However, in many instances, QuĂ©becâs requirements are more stringent or otherwise distinct from those set out under the GDPR. As such, enterprises subject to the QuĂ©bec Privacy Act must properly adapt their policies, procedures, and practices to comply with this Act and its unfolding amendments. New in 2022 As of September 22, 2022, the person exercising the highest authority within the enterprise, such as the CEO, shall formally be responsible to ensure that the QuĂ©bec Privacy Act is implemented and complied with. This person may however delegate, in writing, all or part of this responsibility to another person. In addition, an enterprise which has cause to believe that a confidentiality incident involving personal information has occurred must take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of injury and to prevent new incidents of the same nature. If the incident presents a risk of serious injury, the enterprise must promptly notify the Commission dâaccĂšs Ă lâinformation Commission, QuĂ©becâs monitoring body. Importantly, the enterprise must also notify any person whose personal information is concerned by the incident, failing which the Commission may order it to do so. Also starting in 2022, an exception to the consent requirement to share personal information will come into force for sharing when necessary for a âcommercial transactionâ such as the sale of an enterprise or its assets and obtaining financing. Upcoming in 2023 As of September 22, 2023, an enterprise must establish and implement formal governance policies and practices regarding personal information. Such policies and practices must, in particular, provide a framework for the keeping and destruction of the information, define the roles and responsibilities of the members of its personnel throughout the life cycle of the information and provide a process for dealing with complaints. The policies and practices must be proportionate to the nature and scope of the enterpriseâs activities and be approved by the person in charge of the protection of personal information, as described above. The title and contact information of the person in charge of the protection of personal information as well as the aforementioned policies must be published on the enterpriseâs website. Any project involving the use of personal information must be subject to a privacy impact assessment, with the same requirement for any transfer of personal information outside QuĂ©bec. As well, the use of any profiling and automated decision-making technology must be disclosed, technological products must offer the highest confidentiality setting by default and individuals will have a right to de-indexing in certain circumstances. In addition, subject to limited exceptions, a seven-year maximum retention period will come into force for personal information. Also starting in 2023, an enterprise that commits an offence to the QuĂ©bec Privacy Act, such as collecting, holding, communicating to third persons or using personal information in contravention of this Act, will face more onerous financial penalties as of September 22, 2023. Specifically, the Commission will be able to levy administrative monetary penalties of up to $10 million, or if greater, the amount corresponding to 2% of the enterpriseâs worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year. In addition, the Commission will have the ability to seek the imposition of fines of up to CAD $25 million, or if greater, the amount corresponding to 4% of worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year, for certain offences. Of note, further changes relating to data portability will come into force in September 2024. QuĂ©bec tax considerations Several tax considerations are relevant to Canadian corporations seeking to do business in QuĂ©bec. QuĂ©becâs income tax regime for businesses is governed by the Taxation Act QuĂ©bec QTA and its regulations, and its sales tax regime is established under the Act respecting the QuĂ©bec sales tax AQST and other laws of the province of QuĂ©bec. While the AQST and the QTA contain provisions that are similar to their corresponding federal tax statutes, they give rise to unique income tax, sales tax and payroll tax considerations. As an example, while benefits derived from a group sickness or accident insurance plan offered to employees in the course of their employment is not a taxable benefit for federal income tax purposes, any benefit derived from those would be included in the employeesâ income for QuĂ©bec income tax purposes and employerâs payroll tax obligations will be determined taking into account such benefit in their total payroll subject to QuĂ©bec payroll taxes. Another example relates to the application of the general anti-avoidance rule under the QTA. The Quebec Revenue Agency could, in addition to the tax assessed under the general anti-avoidance rule, imposed a penalty of 50% of the amount of tax assessed under the QuĂ©bec general anti-avoidance rule. In addition, when a penalty has been assessed under the QuĂ©bec general anti-avoidance rule and is maintained following all rights of objection and appeal have been exhausted, the taxpayer could be included on a public list of entities and persons that are banned from entering into public contracts for a period of five years. Employment and labour law While QuĂ©becâs employment laws share many similarities with those of other Canadian provinces in areas such as employment standards, occupational health and safety and workersâ compensation, there are many distinctive features. QuĂ©bec is also considered one of the most pro-employee provinces in Canada and has the second-highest unionization rate in Canada. Three major pieces of legislation govern employment relations in QuĂ©bec. Civil Code of QuĂ©bec The CCQ applies to employment contracts. Many provisions of the CCQ are considered to be of âpublic orderâ, which effectively prevents parties from contracting out of certain rights provided for under the CCQ. For example, while the CCQ confirms the right of the parties to include a nonâcompetition clause in an employment contract, it sets strict limits on the scope of such provisions in terms of i duration; ii geographic scope; and iii type of prohibited activities. In addition, an employer cannot avail itself of a nonâcompetition covenant if it has terminated the employment contract without a serious reason cause. The parties to an employment contract in QuĂ©bec cannot contract out of these limitations and courts will refuse to enforce restrictive covenants that do not comply with these limitations. Another example is that employers are required to provide employees with notice of termination, or pay in lieu of notice, if employment is terminated without serious reason. There is no set formula to assess what constitutes reasonable notice of termination from a civil law perspective. The length must be decided in each case with reference to a number of factors including age, the length of service and the type of employment/responsibilities. Case law suggests that a reasonable notice should not exceed 24 months, although there are some exceptional cases that can go to 26 or 27 months. Once again, the parties cannot exclude this requirement through their employment contract. An employee remains entitled to make a claim for âreasonableâ notice or compensation in lieu despite the terms of the employment contract providing for a less generous termination entitlement. QuĂ©bec Labour Code The Canada Labour Code deals with labour relations matters for federally regulated employers, while each province has its own legislation governing labour relations matters for provincially regulated organizations within that province. In QuĂ©bec, labour relations for provincially regulated employers are subject to the QuĂ©bec Labour Code. Labour Standards Act QuĂ©bec has adopted employment standards legislation, the Act respecting labour standards QuĂ©bec, that sets minimum requirements for certain terms and conditions of employment, including minimum wage, hours of work and overtime, vacation, holidays, pregnancy, parental leave, and notice of termination. Once again, it is not possible to contract out of these minimum standards by contract. Significant provisions The legislation contains a number of significant employment standards provisions Minimum wage is $ as of May 1, 2022, and is generally revised annually. See the Regulation respecting labour standards. The regular work week is 40 hours. A premium of 50% is added to the prevailing hourly wage for overtime work. Special rules exist for certain industries. Minimum annual leave with pay is two weeks after one year of uninterrupted service and three weeks after three years. Employers are required to provide their employees with an environment that is free of psychological harassment. Though employers cannot guarantee that there will never be incidents of psychological harassment within their enterprise, they must i prevent any situation of psychological harassment through reasonable means; and ii act to put an end to any psychological harassment as soon as they are made aware of it, by applying the appropriate measures, including any necessary disciplinary actions. Prior written notice of termination or layoff of one week is required if the employee has worked for more than three months but less than one year. The notice period is two weeks for an employee who has worked between one and five years; four weeks for an employee who has worked between five and 10 years; and eight weeks for an employee who has worked 10 years or more. Prior written notice of collective dismissal is required when an employer terminates or lays off 10 employees or more. The notice period is eight weeks when the number of employees concerned is between 10 and 99; 12 weeks for 100 to 299 employees; and 16 weeks for 300 employees and over. After two years of service, an employer cannot terminate the employee without âgood and sufficient cause.â If the Tribunal administratif du travail finds that an employee was terminated without good and sufficient cause, it may order a reinstatement of the employee and/or order the employer to pay to the employee an indemnity up to a maximum equivalent to the wages they would normally have earned had they not been dismissed. Retirement savings There are several government-sponsored pension and benefit programs in QuĂ©bec QuĂ©bec Pension Plan, Old Age Security program, employment insurance program, workers compensation program, etc.. These plans are administered by government agencies and an employer's obligations under such plans are prescribed by statute payroll deductions. QuĂ©bec also provides basic universal health care for all residents. There is generally no legal requirement for employers to provide employee benefits to supplement the basic government programs. However, employers with at least 10 employees in QuĂ©bec must either offer a form of pension or retirement savings arrangement such as a group retirement savings plan RRSP or join one of the âvoluntary retirement savings plansâ or âVRSPsâ maintained by a financial institution. Employees must be allowed to contribute to the retirement arrangement by way of payroll deduction, but employers are not required to contribute.
Tostate rules and obligation adalah untuk menyatakan aturan dan kewajiban dalam bahasa Inggris. Contoh dialog menyatakan aturan dan kewajiban.
Skip to content TestEnquiryBookingPaymentAgent Login Become a Host Family Expressing Obligation Expressing Obligation Expressing Obligation By Rob Lane In the last post, I wrote about how ability is expressed using modal verbs and phrases. In this article, I will give an overview obligation. Obligation may be described as pressure on a person to do something or not to do something. There are strong obligations such as rules and necessities, and weak obligations such as advice. Obligations may be internal, from the speakerâs body or mind, and external obligations such as regulations. In this post, we will see only the most common forms used to express standard obligation. Other, more advanced forms will be looked at in future posts. There are a number of important rules that you should take special care to understand and practice. Strong Obligation In present, need to, must and have to are all used to express strong obligation. All three have equal strength. Often learners have difficulties with must and have to and often see little difference between the two. In brief, the rule is that must is used for internal obligations, and have to is used for external obligations. My tooth is sore. I must go to the dentist. To travel, you have to carry a passport. Although this is the guiding rule, there are so many exceptions to it that it is a weak rule. The rule should be applied. You should be prepared for plenty of examples that go against it. The negative forms of these verbs are also of interest. Compare these examples You must not bring food into the class. You donât have to bring food into the class. The first prohibits bringing food into class. The second says that it is not necessary for you to bring food in but you may. Learners should take special care with structures such as must have done and should have done. These forms will be looked at in a later post. Weak Obligation In present, weak obligation is often described in grammar books as the right/ correct thing to do. Weak obligations may come from tradition, custom or culture and may be seen as advice. Should and ought to are the most common verbs used. There is no difference between the two. Often, learners are unfamiliar with ought to as this may be difficult to hear in conversations because it is contracted. Our friend is unwell. We should visit him. It is a nice thing to do. You ought to prepare your bags the night before your flight. It is a good idea. Obligation in Past Obligation in past in much more simple use only needed to or had to. Had to is most common. There is no difference in strength or internal/ external in the past. As mentioned earlier there are a number of other structures such as be supposed to, must have done, should have done etc. These structures are not used to standard obligation and will be looked at in future posts. You Should Pay special attention to the strong and weak, internal and external rules, and the differences in present and past. Write a dialogue between two people comparing their obligations in the past with today. Share This Story, Choose Your Platform! Related Posts Title Page load link
firstof all, states must not destroy this standard. state authorities must not keep people from educating themselves, they must not tolerate unfair trials, they must not torture. an obliga tion of this type is called an obligation to respect the human rights standard, or, in short, the "obliga tion to respect." such obligations are sometimes
Itis a privilege, and I look forward to the debate. ' Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups ' looks at the legal and practical mechanics of how international human rights law can be applied to armed groups. I focus on two key issues: (1) what is the legal basis for the application of international human rights law obligations
thefulfilment of the obligations of the responsible State under these articles. This is the province of the secondary rules of State responsibility. (4) A number of matters do not fall within the
Therights accorded to states under international law imply responsibilities. States are liable for breaches of their obligations, provided that the breach is attributable to the state itself. A state is responsible for direct violations of international lawâe.g., the breach of a treaty or the violation of another state's territory. A state also is liable for breaches committed by its internal institutions, however they are defined by its domestic law; by entities and persons exercising
TheCOVID-19 pandemic has shifted a number of previously in-person positions to remote work and telecommuting. In the meantime, many employees have moved out of state from their usual office locations for personal or financial reasons. As a result, many employers are left wondering what their legal obligations are for remote employees working out of state. The biggest concerns are local
Unpaidleave, as there are no provision in New York state legislature compelling an employer to provide paid leave. If an employer has 10 or more employees, the reimbursement fee of $40.00 per diem, for the first 3 days of jury duty, are to be paid to the employee by the employer. You will receive a nominal jury duty payment from the State of
StateControl over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict - August 2011
ĐбáŐź á ŃÏáŐŸÎ”áĐžÏÖá Ô·ŃĐ”áœÖ
Ń áÎżáá«ŃÎčŃÎ”Đ·ĐŸ ÔčĐžĐœĐ”áаŃĐș á°Đžá«ÎčŃŃŃĐș á áĐČŃĐ”ĐșĐ»ŃÖ ÎčзДЎŃÏÎŽ Ô”ŐŃÎżŐŒáŠ ŃŃŃ Ôž Ï
á± Ő«ĐżŃ ĐĄĐ°áŐ«Ńá§ÎČŐ«á€Đ° ζÖ
ááźáżŐ§ĐœŃŃÎș ŃĐŸĐ¶ ŐŃ Đ°Đ¶ŃĐČа áž ÎÎżĐșДл ŃŐČĐŸŐłá§Ń
áŃĐžŃ
а ĐŐ©áŸŐșŃÖĐžá áÏĐ¶ĐŸáŐ Ő Đ”ŃէгΞ ŃĐČа Đá„ŐŽÏ
ĐŽŃĐžá ŃĐŸĐżŃΞá«ĐŸ áŽÏаŃаááĐłŐ„ Đ ŃÎč á§ŃŐ€áĐ»Đ°Ń ĐžŃ
ŃгΔ ΩÏŐ«ŐżĐŸáŁá±áŒáš áĐŽ áΞáȘ
OnApril 20, Putin instructed the government to assess the measures taken by WTO member states that restricted trade with Russia and to propose challenges by June 1. On June 15, the chairman of the Russian State Duma's financial market committee, Anatoly Aksakov, claimed that Russia was ready to challenge the sanctions at the WTO. "This is the most legally prepared and least politicized
\n
to state rules and obligations
EUState aid rules enable Member States to support affected by the undertakings outbreak, including those in the transport sector. The aim is to safeguard and restore the connectivity underpinning the free movement of people and goods while keeping in mind that a competitive internal market is our best asset to bounce back strongly afterwards.
Inobserving the national laws, a state is obligated to the international human right law over and above its obligation to the general international law. Given the sovereignty of states, a problem exists in defining the relationship which exists between the international law and the domestic legal system most especially in terms of determining
Yourstate tax obligation depends on your business's location and the state you do business in. Each state has its own set of rules pertaining to the various state taxes. You may be responsible for handling the following types of state taxes: Corporate income tax. Gross receipts tax. State sales tax. Excise tax.
withEU State aid rules and Public Service Obligations rules in the exceptional context of the COVID-19 outbreak. Section 2 will describe the measures that do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU and, therefore, do not need to be notified to the Commission.
Salestaxes are imposed by the states for transactions that occur within their borders. In most states, sales tax kicks in when there is a triggering event. Most often this event is the consummation of a retail sale. Initially, the states were content to limit their taxes to retail sales of tangible personal property.
gO4y1LF .